MARK 2:13–17 — WHY DID JESUS EAT WITH TAX COLLECTORS AND SINNERS?

Jesus calls Levi and answers the religious leaders who objected to the company He kept.

Introduction — The Growing Opposition to Jesus

In Mark 2:1–12, Jesus forgave a paralyzed man's sins and then healed him. Some scribes questioned His authority.

Now Mark records another controversy.

This time, the question is not whether Jesus has authority to forgive sins. It is why He associates with people whom religious leaders regard as sinners.

Jesus' answer reveals something important about His mission.

1. Jesus Calls Levi — Mark 2:13–14

Jesus went out beside the sea, where a crowd gathered around Him. Once again, Mark tells us that Jesus was teaching.

As Jesus walked along, He saw Levi, the son of Alphaeus, sitting at the tax booth.

Jesus said:

“Follow me.”

Levi got up and followed Him.

Why was Levi collecting taxes?

Tax collectors worked within the Roman system of taxation. They could collect tolls and other payments on goods and trade.

Many Jews resented this system because it supported foreign rule. Tax collectors also had a reputation for dishonesty and taking more money than they were entitled to collect.

However, we should be careful.

Mark does not say Levi was dishonest.

We should not accuse him of sins that Mark does not record.

What Mark emphasizes is Levi's response. Jesus called him, and Levi followed.

This resembles the calling of Simon, Andrew, James, and John in Mark 1:16–20.

Jesus called people from very different occupations, and they responded by following Him.

Was Levi the same person as Matthew?

Matthew 9:9 records a similar calling but names the tax collector Matthew.

Because the accounts are so closely related, Levi has traditionally been identified with Matthew, one of the twelve apostles.

That identification is reasonable, but Mark himself calls the man Levi and does not explicitly identify him as Matthew.

We should distinguish what the text says from what we conclude by comparing Gospel accounts.

2. Jesus Eats With Tax Collectors and Sinners — Mark 2:15

Mark next describes Jesus eating in a house.

Many tax collectors and sinners were eating with Jesus and His disciples.

Mark explains that many were following Him.

In that culture, sharing a meal often expressed fellowship and acceptance of someone as a person.

Jesus was willing to sit with people whom others avoided.

But we should notice something important.

Eating with sinners is not the same as approving their sins.

Jesus could welcome people, teach them, and call them to follow Him without approving everything they had done.

This distinction is central to understanding the passage.

Whose house was it?

Mark says Jesus was reclining at a table in his house. The wording most naturally refers to Levi's house, especially when compared with Luke 5:29, which explicitly says Levi gave a great banquet for Jesus.

Mark's main concern, however, is not the location.

It is the people gathered around Jesus.

3. The Scribes Question Jesus' Conduct — Mark 2:16

The scribes of the Pharisees saw Jesus eating with tax collectors and sinners.

They asked His disciples:

“Why does he eat with tax collectors and sinners?”

Their question reflects a serious disagreement about holiness and association.

The Pharisees were concerned with obedience to God's law and maintaining religious purity.

Those concerns were not automatically wrong. God's people were called to holiness.

But the question was whether avoiding certain people was the proper way to remain holy.

Jesus' conduct challenged their assumptions.

He did not withdraw from people because they were known as sinners.

Instead, He went among them.

Who were the “sinners”?

The word could refer to people known for wrongdoing or people regarded by religious authorities as failing to observe accepted standards of religious conduct.

We should not assume everyone at the meal had committed the same sins.

Nor should we assume the scribes were accusing them all of crimes.

The important point is that these people were regarded as unsuitable company for a respected religious teacher.

Yet Jesus was eating with them.

4. Jesus Explains His Mission — Mark 2:17

When Jesus heard the question, He answered:

“Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I came not to call the righteous, but sinners.”

This is the central statement of the passage.

Jesus compares Himself to a physician.

A physician does not fulfill his purpose by avoiding sick people.

He goes where help is needed.

In the same way, Jesus came to reach sinners.

His association with them was not evidence that He approved of their sins. It was part of His mission to bring them back to God.

Did Jesus believe some people were already righteous and needed no help?

That would be a dangerous conclusion.

Mark has already recorded Jesus proclaiming:

“Repent and believe in the gospel.” (Mark 1:15)

Jesus' message was not that some people needed repentance while others were morally perfect.

His words in Mark 2:17 contrast those recognized as sinners with those who considered themselves righteous or were regarded that way.

The physician illustration makes the point clear.

People who do not recognize their need for help may refuse the very help they need.

However, we should be careful not to claim that Mark explicitly says every scribe at this meal was self-righteous. The text does not examine each person's heart.

Jesus is exposing the problem with treating sinners as people who should be avoided rather than helped.

What does Jesus mean by “call”?

In this immediate context, Jesus has just called Levi to follow Him.

The same theme appears in His explanation that He came to call sinners.

The calling is not an invitation to continue living as before.

Jesus' earlier proclamation included repentance.

Luke 5:32 makes that emphasis explicit, adding that Jesus came to call sinners to repentance.

Mark's shorter statement should be understood in light of the mission Mark has already described.

5. What Does This Passage Teach About Holiness?

Some readers might conclude that holiness requires Christians to avoid people who live sinful lives.

Others might conclude that accepting people means never challenging their behavior.

Neither conclusion follows from this passage.

Jesus demonstrates another approach.

He associated with sinners without surrendering His message.

He welcomed people without declaring sin acceptable.

He called them to follow Him.

Jesus did not require sinners to become respectable before He would speak to them. He came to call them to a different life.

That is the distinction we must preserve.

6. What Does This Passage NOT Teach?

This passage does not teach that every tax collector was dishonest.

It does not teach that Jesus approved of sinful behavior because He shared meals with sinners.

It does not teach that holiness is unimportant.

It does not teach that some human beings are so righteous that they have no need of God's mercy.

And it does not teach that Christians must agree with someone's beliefs or conduct before showing that person kindness.

We must not use Jesus' willingness to eat with sinners either to excuse sin or to justify treating sinners with contempt.

Both conclusions go beyond the text.

7. How Does This Fit Into Mark's Gospel?

Mark 2 contains a series of controversies that reveal Jesus' authority and mission.

In Mark 2:1–12, Jesus demonstrates His authority to forgive sins.

In Mark 2:13–17, He explains why He associates with sinners.

In Mark 2:18–22, questions arise about fasting and the new situation created by Jesus' presence.

In Mark 2:23–28, another controversy develops over the Sabbath.

These are not unrelated stories.

Mark is showing how Jesus' ministry challenged established expectations and forced people to reconsider who He was and why He had come.

The opposition will continue to grow.

By Mark 3:6, some religious leaders are already discussing how to destroy Him.

Conclusion — Why Did Jesus Eat With Sinners?

Jesus answered the question Himself.

A physician goes where sick people need help.

Jesus came to call sinners.

He did not avoid people because of their reputation. Neither did He approve of their sins.

He offered them something they needed: an invitation to follow Him.

The real question is not why Jesus would eat with sinners. It is whether those who recognize their need will respond when He calls.

Continue Studying Mark

Previous Lesson: Mark 2:1–12 — Who Can Forgive Sins But God Alone?

Next Lesson: Mark 2:18–22 — Why Were Jesus' Disciples Not Fasting? (Link to be added after publication.)

Return to HOME and search for another study

Return to YouTube to make comment or ask questions.