WHY DID JESUS CHOOSE TWELVE APOSTLES?
Mark 3:13–19 — A Verse-by-Verse Bible Study
TEXT B4 TRADITION — Read First. Conclude Later.
INTRODUCTION — WHY TWELVE?
Jesus has been attracting enormous crowds.
People have come from Galilee, Judea, Jerusalem, and regions beyond Israel. They have heard about His miracles and want to see Him.
But Jesus is doing something much greater than gathering a crowd.
He is announcing the kingdom of God.
He is revealing His authority over sickness, unclean spirits, sin, and even the Sabbath.
And opposition to Him is growing.
Now Jesus makes an important decision.
He chooses twelve men who will have a special place in His work.
Why twelve?
Why not ten or twenty?
And why did Jesus choose ordinary men, including one who would eventually betray Him?
These questions become especially important when we remember the larger purpose of Jesus' ministry.
He had not come simply to reform a few religious practices.
He had come to fulfill God's promises and accomplish the saving purpose that would lead to His death and resurrection.
The appointment of the twelve belongs to that unfolding mission.
MARK 3:13 — JESUS CALLS THOSE HE WANTS
“And he went up on the mountain and called to him those whom he desired, and they came to him.”
Jesus goes up on a mountain.
Mark does not identify the mountain or explain why Jesus chose that location.
Luke 6:12 adds that Jesus spent the night praying before choosing the twelve.
That detail reminds us that this was an important decision.
Notice who takes the initiative.
Jesus calls those whom He wants.
They respond by coming to Him.
These men do not appoint themselves.
They do not gain their positions through an election.
They are chosen by Jesus.
Their authority will come from the One who calls them, not from their own importance.
This distinction matters throughout the New Testament.
The apostles are not independent religious authorities. They are servants and witnesses commissioned by Christ.
Their responsibility is to carry His message, not invent their own.
MARK 3:14 — WHY DID JESUS APPOINT TWELVE?
“And he appointed twelve (whom he also named apostles) so that they might be with him and he might send them out to preach.”
This is one of the most important verses in the passage.
Mark tells us that Jesus appointed twelve and gives two purposes for their appointment.
1. They were to be with Him
Before they were sent out, they were to spend time with Jesus.
They would hear His teaching.
They would watch His miracles.
They would see how He responded to religious opposition.
They would witness His compassion toward sinners and the suffering.
They would also see His rejection, suffering, death, and resurrection.
This was not merely classroom instruction.
They were being prepared as witnesses.
Later, when Judas needed to be replaced, Acts 1:21–22 emphasized the importance of someone who had accompanied Jesus' followers during His ministry and could testify to His resurrection.
The apostles were to teach what they had received from Jesus, not what they had invented for themselves.
2. They were to be sent out to preach
The word apostle means someone who is sent.
In this setting, Jesus is appointing men whom He will commission to proclaim His message.
Their work begins with Jesus' own announcement:
“The kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel” (Mark 1:15).
Later, Mark 6:7–13 records Jesus sending out the twelve to preach repentance, cast out demons, and heal the sick.
Their authority and message come from Him.
They are not establishing twelve separate religious movements.
They are serving one Lord and announcing one kingdom.
Why exactly twelve?
Mark does not explain the number in this verse.
But the number twelve had an established meaning in Israel's history.
Jacob, whose name was changed to Israel, had twelve sons. Their descendants became the twelve tribes of Israel (Genesis 35:22–26).
Jesus' selection of twelve men therefore carries a significance that Jewish readers would recognize.
The connection becomes clearer in Matthew 19:28 and Luke 22:29–30, where Jesus connects the twelve apostles with the twelve tribes of Israel and His kingdom.
The choice of twelve points toward the fulfillment of God's promises concerning His people.
We should not claim that Mark 3:14 alone explains every detail of that fulfillment.
But the connection is too important to ignore.
Jesus is gathering a people under the authority of the promised Messiah.
MARK 3:15 — AUTHORITY OVER UNCLEAN SPIRITS
“And have authority to cast out demons.”
Jesus gives the twelve authority to cast out demons.
Notice that this authority is given to them.
It does not originate with the apostles.
Throughout Mark, Jesus has demonstrated His authority over unclean spirits.
Now He authorizes the twelve to exercise that power as part of their mission.
This confirms that they represent Him.
Their work is not simply a matter of persuasive speaking.
Jesus gives them authority to demonstrate the power of God's kingdom over evil.
Mark 6:7–13 later shows them exercising that authority.
But we should not overlook the distinction between the message and the signs accompanying it.
The apostles are sent to preach.
Their authority over unclean spirits supports their mission.
The message of God's kingdom remains central.
MARK 3:16 — SIMON, WHOM JESUS NAMED PETER
“He appointed the twelve: Simon (to whom he gave the name Peter).”
Simon is listed first.
Jesus gives him the name Peter.
Peter will become one of the most prominent apostles in the Gospel accounts and in the early chapters of Acts.
But Mark does not present Peter as a man who never makes mistakes.
Peter will confess Jesus as the Christ (Mark 8:29).
He will also resist Jesus' teaching about His coming death (Mark 8:32–33).
Later, he will deny knowing Jesus (Mark 14:66–72).
Yet Peter will become a bold witness to the resurrection (Acts 2).
His story reminds us that being chosen by Jesus did not mean he already understood everything or possessed flawless character.
Jesus was preparing these men for what they would become, not rewarding them for already having all the answers.
MARK 3:17 — JAMES AND JOHN, THE SONS OF THUNDER
“James the son of Zebedee and John the brother of James (to whom he gave the name Boanerges, that is, Sons of Thunder).”
James and John were brothers.
Jesus gave them the name “Sons of Thunder.”
Mark does not explain exactly why He gave them this name.
We should be careful not to build an elaborate explanation upon something the text leaves unexplained.
However, Luke 9:54 records James and John asking whether they should call down fire from heaven upon a Samaritan village that rejected Jesus.
And in Mark 10:35–45, they ask for positions of honor in His glory.
These incidents show that they still had much to learn about the character of Jesus' kingdom.
In Mark 10, Jesus teaches them that greatness among His followers is measured by service, not by the exercise of power over others.
The Son of Man Himself came to serve and give His life as a ransom for many.
That is an important part of their training.
They had to learn that the kingdom Jesus was establishing was not organized around the ambitions of earthly rulers.
MARK 3:18 — THE OTHER APOSTLES
“Andrew, and Philip, and Bartholomew, and Matthew, and Thomas, and James the son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus, and Simon the Zealot.”
Mark lists the remaining apostles.
We know considerably more about some than others.
Andrew was Simon Peter's brother (John 1:40–42).
Philip appears in several accounts in John's Gospel.
Matthew is identified as a tax collector in Matthew 10:3.
Thomas later expresses his doubts about Jesus' resurrection before confessing Him as his Lord and God (John 20:24–29).
Others receive relatively little attention in the New Testament.
This should remind us that the importance of their appointment did not depend upon how much attention each man received.
Simon the Zealot
Simon is called “the Zealot.”
The term may indicate his association with zealous religious or national interests, but Mark does not tell us his political history.
We should not assume details about his former activities that Scripture does not provide.
Nevertheless, the inclusion of men with different backgrounds is striking.
Matthew had worked as a tax collector.
Simon bore the designation Zealot.
Whatever their earlier loyalties, both were now called to serve the same Messiah.
Their allegiance to Jesus was to take priority over everything else.
The kingdom of God was not being built upon the political or social divisions that separated people.
It was being established under the authority of Christ.
MARK 3:19 — JUDAS ISCARIOT, WHO BETRAYED HIM
“And Judas Iscariot, who betrayed him.”
Mark ends the list with Judas.
He immediately identifies Judas as the one who betrayed Jesus.
This is a sobering detail.
Judas was not an outsider who suddenly appeared near the end of Jesus' ministry.
He was one of the twelve.
He had been selected to be with Jesus.
He heard His teaching and witnessed His works.
Yet he would eventually betray Him.
Did Jesus make a mistake in choosing Judas?
The New Testament gives us no reason to conclude that Jesus made a mistake.
John 6:70–71 records Jesus speaking about the coming betrayal long before it occurred.
John 13:18 connects the betrayal with the fulfillment of Scripture.
And Acts 2:23 teaches that Jesus' death occurred according to God's definite plan and foreknowledge.
These passages do not answer every question about Judas' responsibility or the relationship between God's foreknowledge and human choices.
But they establish something important.
Judas' betrayal did not defeat God's purpose.
Jesus' death was not an unexpected failure that forced God to develop another plan.
It was central to the saving work Christ had come to accomplish.
At the same time, Scripture holds Judas responsible for his betrayal (Mark 14:21).
We must preserve both truths rather than use one to cancel the other.
GOING DEEPER — WHAT DOES THE CHOICE OF TWELVE TELL US ABOUT THE KINGDOM?
This is where the passage becomes especially important.
Jesus did not choose twelve merely because He needed twelve assistants.
The number recalls the twelve tribes of Israel.
God had made promises to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and their descendants.
He had promised a kingdom.
He had promised a new covenant.
And He had promised that the nations would be blessed through Abraham's offspring.
Now the Messiah has come.
And He chooses twelve apostles.
Was Jesus simply restoring the old national kingdom of Israel?
The New Testament gives us a larger picture.
In Mark 1:15, Jesus announces the arrival of God's kingdom.
In Mark 8:31, He teaches that He must suffer, die, and rise again.
In Mark 10:42–45, He explains that leadership in His kingdom differs from the rule of earthly authorities.
In Mark 14:24, He speaks of His blood in connection with the covenant.
And after His resurrection, the apostles are sent to proclaim the gospel to the nations (Matthew 28:18–20; Acts 1:8).
The promised kingdom is not established through a military victory over Rome.
Jesus establishes His reign through His death, resurrection, and exaltation.
What happens to God's promises to Israel?
They are not forgotten.
They reach their fulfillment in Christ.
Jeremiah 31:31–34 promised a new covenant with Israel and Judah.
Hebrews 8:6–13 explains the significance of that promise in relation to Jesus.
Ephesians 2:11–22 teaches that Gentiles who were once separated from Israel's covenant privileges have been brought near through Christ.
Jesus has made Jews and Gentiles one, reconciling both to God through the cross.
This does not mean the apostles understood all these things when Jesus first appointed them.
They would learn much of it only after His death, resurrection, and the coming of the Holy Spirit.
But we, reading the completed New Testament, can recognize where Jesus' mission was leading.
The appointment of twelve apostles belongs to God's plan to fulfill His promises and gather one people under Jesus Christ.
Does this mean the twelve apostles were the twelve tribes of Israel?
We should express the connection carefully.
The New Testament connects the twelve apostles with the twelve tribes, but it does not simply say that each apostle became a replacement for one tribe.
Matthew 19:28 and Luke 22:30 speak of the apostles judging the twelve tribes.
Revelation 21:12–14 pictures the New Jerusalem with the names of the twelve tribes on its gates and the names of the twelve apostles on its foundations.
The distinction remains visible even as both belong to the picture of God's completed work.
The strongest conclusion is this:
Jesus' choice of twelve was a deliberate sign of the importance of Israel's promises in the kingdom He was establishing.
The apostles would become foundational witnesses to Christ and His gospel.
Ephesians 2:20 describes God's household as built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the cornerstone.
The foundation is not twelve independent authorities.
It is one household, established through Christ.
WHY DID JESUS CHOOSE MEN WHO WERE SO IMPERFECT?
Consider the men Jesus selected.
Peter would deny Him.
James and John would seek positions of honor.
Thomas would struggle to believe the resurrection.
The disciples would repeatedly misunderstand His teaching.
Judas would betray Him.
Why choose such men?
Mark does not give us a complete explanation for every choice.
But the Gospel shows Jesus patiently teaching, correcting, and preparing them.
Their failures would make one thing clear.
The success of Jesus' mission depended upon Jesus, not upon the natural greatness of the men He chose.
After His resurrection, the apostles would proclaim what God had accomplished through Christ.
Their message would not be that they had built the kingdom through their own wisdom.
Their message would be that God had raised Jesus from the dead and made Him both Lord and Christ (Acts 2:32–36).
That is where the attention belongs.
WHAT SHOULD WE LEARN FROM THIS PASSAGE?
1. Jesus was carrying out a deliberate plan
He did not simply gather whoever happened to be nearby.
He selected twelve men for a particular purpose.
They were to be with Him and then be sent out to preach.
2. Their authority came from Jesus
They were not free to invent their own message.
They were commissioned to represent Him.
The same principle should guide Bible teaching today.
Our responsibility is to explain what Christ and His apostles taught, not substitute our own religious traditions.
3. The number twelve connects Jesus' work with God's promises to Israel
The kingdom Jesus announced was not an unrelated new idea.
It belonged to the fulfillment of God's promises.
But its fulfillment would be greater than many expected.
Through Christ, the blessings promised to Abraham would reach the nations.
4. Being close to Jesus does not automatically mean understanding or obeying Him
Judas was one of the twelve.
Peter repeatedly misunderstood Jesus.
The apostles needed correction and instruction.
We should never confuse religious position, knowledge, or association with genuine faithfulness.
5. Jesus' mission was greater than the men He selected
The apostles were important.
But Jesus remained central.
They would become His witnesses.
He would accomplish the work of salvation.
CONCLUSION — TWELVE MEN, ONE MESSIAH, ONE PURPOSE
At first glance, Mark 3:13–19 may look like little more than a list of names.
But something important is happening.
Jesus has announced the kingdom.
He has demonstrated His authority.
Opposition is increasing.
And now He appoints twelve men to be with Him and to carry His message.
The number twelve recalls God's promises to Israel.
Their appointment points forward to the apostolic witness through which the gospel would reach the nations.
And their weaknesses remind us that the work depended upon Christ, not upon their greatness.
Jesus was not simply organizing a group of followers.
He was preparing witnesses for the fulfillment of God's saving purpose.
The Messiah had come.
The promised kingdom was being announced.
The cross and resurrection lay ahead.
And through Jesus Christ, God's promises would reach their fulfillment.
The twelve were important because of the One who called them and the message He would entrust to them.
CONTINUE READING IN MARK
Previous Study: Mark 3:7–12 — Why Did Jesus Silence the Unclean Spirits?
Why did Jesus command silence when the unclean spirits correctly identified Him as the Son of God?
https://text-b4-tradition.com/mark-3-7-12
Next Study: Mark 3:20–30 — Why Did Jesus Warn About Blasphemy Against the Holy Spirit?
Jesus' opponents accuse Him of casting out demons by the power of Satan.
His answer exposes the weakness of their accusation and leads to one of the most serious warnings in the Gospels.
TEXT B4 TRADITION
Read First. Conclude Later.
Suggested page address:
https://text-b4-tradition.com/mark-3-13-19
Return to the HOME page
Return to YouTube to leave a comment or question.