WHAT ABOUT GENDER IDENTITY?
Scripture & Culture — Study 6
Does the Bible Tell Us What Makes Someone Male or Female?
TEXT B4 TRADITION — Read First. Conclude Later.
1. Before We Begin: What Are We Actually Asking?
Few questions today produce more confusion and disagreement than gender identity.
Some people believe that being male or female is determined by the body with which a person is born.
Others believe that a person's inward sense of being male, female, both, or neither may differ from the sex recorded at birth.
Christians disagree about how Scripture applies to these questions.
But before deciding who is right, we need to ask:
What does the Bible actually say?
The Bible was written long before modern discussions of gender identity. It does not use terms such as transgender, gender dysphoria, or nonbinary.
That does not mean Scripture has nothing to teach us.
It means we must distinguish between what Scripture directly addresses and how we apply its teachings to questions the biblical writers did not discuss in our modern terms.
We will examine creation, Jesus' teaching, the Law of Moses, the apostles, and the place of people whose bodies or experiences do not fit ordinary expectations.
Our purpose is not to win an argument.
It is to understand Scripture and treat every person with the dignity and love that Scripture commands.
2. What Do We Mean by Sex and Gender Identity?
Before examining biblical passages, we need to understand the terms being used.
Biological sex refers to physical characteristics associated with male and female reproductive development. These include reproductive anatomy, hormones, chromosomes, and other features.
For most people, these characteristics develop in recognizable male or female patterns.
However, some people are born with variations in sexual development, sometimes called intersex traits or differences of sex development.
These variations are real biological conditions. They should not be confused automatically with transgender identity.
Gender identity refers to a person's inward understanding or experience of being male, female, both, neither, or another gender.
Gender expression refers to how someone presents themselves through clothing, appearance, mannerisms, or other social behavior.
These three subjects are related, but they are not identical.
A person may reject traditional expectations about clothing or behavior without questioning whether they are male or female.
A person may also experience a persistent conflict between their sex characteristics and their gender identity.
That experience is sometimes accompanied by significant distress, called gender dysphoria.
We should not assume that everyone who identifies as transgender experiences the same feelings or circumstances.
Nor should we assume that a person's experience tells us everything about their character, beliefs, or relationship with God.
With those distinctions in mind, we can begin with Scripture.
3. What Does Genesis Say About Male and Female?
Read Genesis 1:26–28.
Genesis teaches that God created humanity in His image.
Then verse 27 identifies humanity as male and female.
Both are included in God's image.
Both receive His blessing.
Both are given responsibility within His creation.
The passage does not teach that men are more valuable than women or that women are less fully human.
Male and female share equal human dignity because both are created in God's image.
Genesis 2:18–24 develops the account by describing the creation of woman and the relationship between man and woman.
The distinction between male and female is part of the creation account.
It is not presented as a human invention.
What does this establish?
It establishes that God created humanity with a male-and-female distinction.
It also connects that distinction with the continuation of human life through reproduction (Genesis 1:28).
But does Genesis explain every possible variation in human sexual development?
No.
Does it directly discuss a person who experiences an inward gender identity different from their physical sex?
No.
Those are modern questions we must consider in light of the broader biblical teaching.
Two interpretations
The traditional interpretation: Genesis establishes male and female as created realities grounded in the body. A person's identity should therefore be understood in relation to that created reality.
The affirming interpretation: Genesis describes the ordinary male-and-female pattern of creation, but does not necessarily exclude every variation in human experience or settle every question about gender identity.
Both interpretations agree that human beings bear God's image.
They disagree about what conclusions should be drawn from the creation account.
4. Does Being Made in God's Image Depend on Being Male or Female?
This question is especially important.
Genesis does not say that men possess more of God's image than women.
Nor does it say that people whose bodies develop differently possess less of God's image.
The image of God belongs to humanity.
That includes people whose lives or bodies do not fit common expectations.
Therefore, whatever conclusions Christians reach about gender identity, they must begin with the dignity of every human being.
No disagreement about gender identity removes a person's worth as someone made in God's image.
This is not a modern addition to Christianity.
It follows directly from Genesis.
5. What Did Jesus Teach About Male and Female?
Read Matthew 19:3–12.
Jesus was answering a question about divorce.
He referred to God's creation of humanity as male and female and quoted Genesis 2:24 concerning marriage.
Jesus treated the creation account as authoritative.
This supports the conclusion that the male-and-female distinction remains significant in His teaching.
However, Jesus was discussing marriage and divorce.
He was not answering a question about modern gender identity.
We should not claim that He explicitly addressed something He did not discuss.
What about Matthew 19:12?
After discussing marriage, Jesus spoke about eunuchs.
He mentioned people who were eunuchs from birth, those made eunuchs by others, and those who chose a life of celibacy for the kingdom of heaven.
The word eunuch could refer to a man who had been castrated or, in some settings, to someone associated with a royal court.
In Matthew 19, Jesus distinguishes several circumstances connected with marriage and celibacy.
His statement recognizes that not everyone's circumstances fit the ordinary expectation of marriage and family life.
But it would be inaccurate to claim that Jesus was specifically discussing modern transgender identity.
He was not.
Jesus affirmed creation's male-and-female pattern while also acknowledging that human circumstances are not always simple.
Both observations matter.
6. What About People Born With Differences in Sexual Development?
Some people are born with physical characteristics that do not follow typical male or female developmental patterns.
These may involve chromosomes, reproductive anatomy, hormones, or the body's response to hormones.
The existence of such conditions does not mean that biological sex is imaginary.
It does mean that determining a person's sex can sometimes involve more than looking at one physical characteristic.
How should Christians understand these circumstances?
Scripture does not provide a medical classification of differences in sexual development.
Nor does it explain how every such condition should be understood.
Jesus' reference to people who were eunuchs from birth shows that He recognized unusual bodily circumstances.
However, we should not assume that all ancient eunuchs had what medicine today calls an intersex condition.
The categories are not identical.
What can we conclude?
The ordinary male-and-female pattern is clearly presented in Genesis.
But Scripture does not tell us how to classify every variation in human sexual development.
We should be especially cautious about making absolute claims where Scripture has not provided a direct answer.
And we should never treat a person born with such a condition as defective in human worth.
7. What Does Deuteronomy 22:5 Teach?
Read Deuteronomy 22:5.
This passage prohibits a woman from wearing what pertains to a man and a man from wearing a woman's garment.
At first reading, it may seem to settle questions about gender expression.
But we must examine the context.
Deuteronomy was part of the Law given to Israel under the old covenant.
Christians do not automatically apply every regulation of that covenant in the same way today.
The surrounding chapter includes instructions concerning clothing materials, agricultural practices, and other matters connected with Israel's life.
Therefore, we must ask what principle the command expressed and how that principle applies under the new covenant.
What was the command addressing?
The passage distinguishes between male and female clothing or items associated with their roles.
Its exact historical purpose is debated.
Some interpreters understand it as protecting the distinction between male and female.
Others suggest that it may also have addressed particular cultural practices, including deceptive behavior or practices associated with pagan worship.
The passage itself does not explicitly explain every reason for the prohibition.
Can we apply it directly to modern clothing?
Clothing customs differ greatly across cultures and centuries.
A garment considered masculine in one society may be considered feminine in another.
Therefore, we should not assume that the clothing styles of our own culture establish permanent biblical rules.
Deuteronomy 22:5 shows that distinctions between male and female mattered in Israel's law. It does not, by itself, answer every modern question about gender identity or gender expression.
8. What Does Galatians 3:28 Mean?
Read Galatians 3:26–29.
Paul teaches that believers are children of God through faith in Christ Jesus.
He then says that in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female.
Some Christians understand this as evidence that gender distinctions should no longer determine a person's standing or role within the Christian community.
Others argue that Paul is discussing equal access to salvation, not the elimination of physical distinctions.
Which interpretation best fits the context?
Paul's subject is belonging to Christ and becoming heirs of God's promise.
He is not explaining human anatomy or defining gender identity.
His statement does not mean Jewish and Greek people cease to have different histories.
Nor does it mean men and women cease to have physical differences.
It means those distinctions do not determine whether someone belongs to Christ.
Galatians 3:28 teaches equal standing in Christ. It does not explicitly teach that biological sex or gender identity can be changed by personal declaration.
But it also warns Christians against treating people as spiritually inferior because of their sex or social position.
9. What About Eunuchs in Isaiah 56 and Acts 8?
Read Isaiah 56:3–5 and Acts 8:26–39.
These passages deserve special attention.
Under the Law of Moses, certain physical conditions affected participation in Israel's assembly (Deuteronomy 23:1).
But Isaiah looked forward to a time when faithful eunuchs would receive a place and a name among God's people.
The promise emphasized faithfulness to God rather than the ability to produce descendants.
In Acts 8, an Ethiopian eunuch hears the good news about Jesus from Philip.
When he understands the gospel, he asks to be baptized.
Philip baptizes him.
The account does not describe the eunuch as spiritually inferior because of his bodily or social circumstances.
Does this establish a biblical teaching about transgender identity?
Not directly.
Ancient eunuchs and modern transgender people are not interchangeable categories.
Nevertheless, these passages establish something important:
God's welcome is not limited to people whose bodies or circumstances fit ordinary expectations about marriage and reproduction.
That is a biblical truth we must preserve.
10. What About the Body?
Read 1 Corinthians 6:12–20.
Paul teaches that the Christian's body belongs to the Lord.
He reminds believers that their bodies are members of Christ and temples of the Holy Spirit.
His immediate subject is sexual immorality.
He is not discussing modern gender identity.
Nevertheless, his teaching establishes that the body matters in Christian discipleship.
Christianity does not treat the body as an unimportant shell containing the real person.
God created human beings as embodied creatures.
The Christian hope includes the resurrection of the body (1 Corinthians 15:42–49).
How does this relate to gender identity?
Some Christians argue that because the body is part of God's creation, biological sex should guide a person's understanding of being male or female.
Others respond that bodily development can involve unusual conditions and that caring for the body sometimes requires medical intervention.
The general teaching that the body matters is clear.
But deciding how that teaching applies to every experience of gender incongruence requires further reasoning.
We should not confuse a biblical principle with an application that still needs to be demonstrated.
11. Is Gender Identity the Same as Gender Expression?
No.
This distinction can prevent considerable confusion.
A man may enjoy activities or clothing that his culture ordinarily associates with women.
A woman may prefer work or activities traditionally associated with men.
Such preferences do not automatically mean that the person identifies as another gender.
The Bible itself presents men and women with a variety of personalities, abilities, and responsibilities.
Deborah served as a judge in Israel (Judges 4–5).
Priscilla helped explain God's way more accurately to Apollos (Acts 18:24–26).
David expressed deep affection and grief.
Jesus wept.
None of these examples suggests that a person's sex changes because of personality or behavior.
We should not allow cultural stereotypes to determine what makes someone male or female.
The question of gender identity is more specific than whether someone fits society's expectations.
12. What About People Who Experience Gender Dysphoria?
Some people experience significant distress because their sense of gender does not agree with their physical sex characteristics.
For some, the experience begins in childhood. For others, it becomes apparent later.
Not everyone experiences it in the same way.
Christians should be cautious about claiming that such experiences are always chosen, invented, or caused by one particular influence.
Scripture does not provide that explanation.
Nor should we assume that every person who experiences gender dysphoria reaches the same conclusions about what to do.
Some seek social changes, some seek medical treatment, and others do neither.
What should Christians do?
First, listen carefully.
Second, speak truthfully.
Third, recognize that a person's distress may be real even when we disagree about its meaning or the best response.
Fourth, avoid making promises or accusations that Scripture does not support.
The Bible commands Christians to bear one another's burdens (Galatians 6:2).
It also commands them to speak the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15).
Those responsibilities belong together.
13. Does Scripture Teach That Feelings Determine Identity?
The Bible recognizes that human beings have inward thoughts, desires, emotions, and experiences.
But it does not teach that every inward conviction necessarily establishes an objective truth.
Proverbs 14:12 warns that a way may seem right to a person but lead somewhere unexpected.
Jeremiah 17:9 warns about the difficulty of understanding the human heart.
Yet these passages should not be used carelessly.
They do not mean that every personal experience is false.
Nor do they mean that a Christian may dismiss another person's testimony without listening.
They teach the need for humility and careful judgment.
The central question
Does an inward sense of being male or female determine a person's sex, or should that identity be understood in relation to the body?
Scripture does not directly formulate this modern question.
Genesis connects male and female with God's creation of embodied humanity.
That gives the traditional understanding an important biblical foundation.
But the Bible does not provide a complete account of modern gender psychology or every possible conflict between bodily characteristics and personal experience.
Therefore, we must distinguish the biblical teaching from conclusions we draw when applying it.
14. What About Changing One's Body?
This is one of the most difficult modern questions.
Some people experiencing gender dysphoria seek changes in appearance, social identification, hormones, or surgery.
These are not all the same action, and they do not carry the same consequences.
Scripture does not directly discuss modern gender-related medical treatments.
Some Christians argue that deliberately changing sex-related bodily characteristics conflicts with accepting the body God has given.
Others argue that medical treatment can sometimes be an appropriate response to serious suffering, just as Christians accept medical care for many other physical conditions.
Both arguments require careful examination.
The fact that a treatment changes the body does not, by itself, establish that it is wrong. Many accepted medical treatments change bodily functions or appearance.
But neither does the possibility of relieving suffering automatically establish that every proposed treatment is wise or morally appropriate.
Questions about medical benefits, risks, reversibility, and individual circumstances require reliable medical evidence as well as ethical reasoning.
We should not pretend that a biblical passage directly approves or forbids a particular modern medical procedure when it does not discuss that procedure.
Christians must consider biblical principles carefully while recognizing the limits of what Scripture explicitly addresses.
15. What About Names and Pronouns?
Modern discussions about gender identity often involve requests to use particular names or pronouns.
The Bible does not directly address this modern social question.
Christians therefore disagree about how to respond.
Some believe that using a person's requested pronouns would communicate agreement with an understanding of gender they believe conflicts with Scripture.
Others believe that using a requested name or pronoun is an act of courtesy that does not necessarily express agreement with every belief about gender.
Both groups may appeal to biblical principles concerning truthfulness and love.
Ephesians 4:25 teaches believers to speak truthfully.
Colossians 4:6 teaches them to speak graciously.
The challenge is to apply both principles without assuming that one automatically cancels the other.
Christians should not deliberately humiliate people or use language as a weapon.
Where sincere disagreement remains, humility and respectful conversation are better than hostility.
16. What Are the Strongest Christian Arguments on Both Sides?
We should state the arguments fairly before evaluating them.
The traditional understanding
Christians holding this view emphasize that:
God created humanity male and female.
The distinction is presented as part of creation, not merely a social custom.
Human beings are embodied creatures, and the body matters.
Jesus affirmed the creation account.
Scripture does not teach that inward feelings can redefine biological sex.
On this understanding, Christians should affirm the goodness of the created body while responding compassionately to people experiencing gender dysphoria.
The affirming understanding
Christians holding this view emphasize that:
The Bible does not directly address modern transgender identity.
Genesis describes the ordinary pattern of creation without necessarily resolving every unusual circumstance.
Some people experience persistent gender incongruence that is not simply a preference or social role.
Scripture repeatedly emphasizes human dignity, mercy, and God's welcome.
The passages about eunuchs show that God's people include those whose bodily circumstances do not fit ordinary expectations.
On this understanding, recognizing a person's gender identity may be compatible with Christian faithfulness and care.
Where do the arguments differ?
The disagreement is not primarily over whether Genesis says God created humanity male and female.
Both sides can acknowledge that.
The disagreement concerns what follows from that statement.
Does it establish that a person's gender identity must always correspond to biological sex?
Or does it describe the ordinary creation pattern while leaving room for circumstances the text does not directly discuss?
That is the question requiring careful interpretation.
17. What Can We Actually Conclude From Scripture?
Let us gather the evidence.
Genesis 1:26–28: God created humanity in His image, male and female.
Genesis 2: The creation account presents male and female as part of God's design for human life.
Matthew 19:4–12: Jesus affirms the creation account while also acknowledging different circumstances concerning marriage and eunuchs.
Deuteronomy 22:5: Israel's law recognizes distinctions between male and female, although its direct application under the new covenant requires interpretation.
Galatians 3:26–29: Male and female have equal standing in Christ.
Isaiah 56 and Acts 8: God's welcome extends to faithful people whose bodily or social circumstances differ from ordinary expectations.
1 Corinthians 6: The body matters in Christian discipleship.
These passages establish several truths.
First, male and female are significant categories in biblical creation teaching.
Second, the human body is not irrelevant to Christian understanding of personhood.
Third, every human being possesses dignity as someone made in God's image.
Fourth, Scripture does not directly define modern gender identity or provide specific instructions for every contemporary question about social or medical transition.
Which understanding has the stronger biblical foundation?
The traditional understanding has a clear biblical foundation for treating male and female as created, embodied realities rather than merely personal or social labels.
Genesis and Jesus' appeal to creation provide that foundation.
However, the further claim that every modern question about gender identity is thereby settled requires additional reasoning.
The affirming interpretation correctly observes that Scripture does not directly discuss modern transgender identity and that Christians must not overlook the dignity and experiences of those affected.
But biblical silence alone does not establish that every proposed understanding of gender identity is compatible with Scripture.
Therefore, we should not present either the creation account or biblical silence as though it automatically answers every question.
The clearest biblical conclusion is that God created humanity male and female, that our bodies matter, and that every person bears God's image.
How those teachings apply to particular experiences of gender incongruence and to specific social or medical decisions remains a matter requiring careful interpretation and judgment.
That is not avoiding Scripture.
It is refusing to claim more than Scripture actually establishes.
18. How Should Christians Treat People Who Identify as Transgender?
Whatever conclusions we reach, several biblical commands are not in dispute.
Jesus commands us to love our neighbors (Matthew 22:39).
He teaches us to treat others as we would want to be treated (Matthew 7:12).
Paul commands Christians to speak truthfully and lovingly (Ephesians 4:15, 25).
James warns against showing partiality (James 2:1–9).
These commands apply to everyone.
A Christian should not ridicule, threaten, humiliate, or mistreat someone because of their gender identity.
Nor should Christians assume they know another person's motives, experiences, or spiritual condition.
At the same time, love does not require abandoning sincere convictions about Scripture.
Agape love seeks what is genuinely best for another person.
That requires both compassion and truthfulness.
We should be willing to listen, willing to study, and willing to correct our own conclusions when Scripture and sound evidence require it.
19. A Simple Answer
What does the Bible teach about gender identity?
The Bible teaches that God created humanity male and female and that our embodied existence matters.
It also teaches that every person bears God's image and deserves dignity and love.
The Bible does not directly discuss the modern concept of gender identity or give detailed instructions concerning transgender identification and transition.
Therefore, the creation account provides an important foundation for Christian thinking, but we must be careful not to treat every modern application as an explicit biblical command.
Some Christians conclude that gender identity should correspond to biological sex.
Others believe Scripture leaves room for recognizing gender identities that differ from sex assigned at birth.
Those conclusions involve interpretation beyond the Bible's direct statements.
We should affirm what Scripture clearly teaches, examine what must be inferred, and acknowledge what it does not directly answer.
And whatever our conclusions, we must treat every person with agape love.
20. Questions Worth Asking Before You Decide
What does Genesis actually establish about male and female?
Does the creation account answer every question about unusual bodily development?
What was Jesus discussing when He referred to male and female?
Are ancient eunuchs equivalent to modern transgender people?
Does Galatians 3:28 eliminate sexual distinctions, or teach equal standing in Christ?
Does Deuteronomy 22:5 establish a permanent rule about modern clothing and gender expression?
What does Scripture teach about the relationship between the body and personal identity?
Are we confusing cultural expectations about masculinity and femininity with biblical teaching?
Are we presenting our own applications as though they were explicit statements of Scripture?
Can we explain our conclusions while treating those who disagree with genuine love?
The Final Principle
Read the passage. Examine its context. Compare Scripture with Scripture. Consider the strongest alternative interpretation. Do not go beyond what the evidence supports.
Then let the reader examine the Scriptures and reach a conclusion before God.
TEXT B4 TRADITION
Read First. Conclude Later.
Return to HOME page
Return to CULTURE page