Who Is the Man of Lawlessness?

What Does 2 Thessalonians 2 Actually Say?

Few biblical figures have accumulated more details than the person Paul calls:

“the man of lawlessness.”

For many Christians, the picture is already familiar.

A future world ruler appears after the Church is raptured.

He makes a seven-year agreement with Israel.

A Jewish Temple has been rebuilt in Jerusalem.

Halfway through the seven years, he enters that Temple, declares himself to be God, and begins the Great Tribulation.

Finally, Jesus returns and destroys him.

That is a detailed story.

But how much of it comes from 2 Thessalonians 2?

Before connecting Paul with Daniel...

Before connecting him with Revelation...

Before calling this man “the Antichrist”...

Let's first ask:

WHAT DOES PAUL ACTUALLY SAY?

1. Begin With the Problem Paul Was Addressing

Paul was not writing a prophecy handbook.

He was writing to frightened Christians.

He says:

“Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him...”

— 2 Thessalonians 2:1

Notice those two things:

The coming of Jesus.

And:

Our gathering to Him.

That sounds remarkably like what Paul had already described in his first letter:

“We... will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air.”

— 1 Thessalonians 4:17

Paul's subject is Christ's coming and the gathering of His people.

2. Someone Had Frightened Them

Paul continues:

“We ask you, brothers and sisters, not to become easily unsettled or alarmed...”

— 2 Thessalonians 2:1–2

Why were they alarmed?

Someone was claiming:

“the day of the Lord has already come.”

Perhaps the claim came through a prophecy.

Perhaps through a report.

Perhaps through a letter falsely attributed to Paul.

Whatever the source, these Christians were frightened.

Paul tells them:

DON'T BE DECEIVED.

Something must happen before the Day arrives.

3. Paul Says Something Comes First

Paul says:

“Don't let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed.”

— 2 Thessalonians 2:3

Translations differ over the word rendered “rebellion.”

Some say:

“apostasy.”

Others:

“rebellion.”

The Greek word is apostasia.

Its ordinary idea is rebellion, defection, or falling away.

Paul connects this rebellion with the revelation of:

“the man of lawlessness.”

So Paul does give his readers something to expect before the Day of the Lord.

But notice what he does not say.

He does not say:

“After the Church is secretly raptured...”

In fact, the subject he introduced was:

“the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him.”

Then he says not to believe that Day has arrived until certain things happen.

That deserves careful attention.

4. Is the “Apostasy” Actually the Rapture?

Some interpreters have suggested that apostasia means a physical departure and therefore refers to the rapture.

If so, Paul would be saying:

The Day cannot come until the Church first departs from the earth.

But is that what Paul says?

The word normally refers to rebellion or abandonment.

More importantly, Paul does not say:

“our departure.”

He speaks of:

“the rebellion”

and immediately connects it with the revelation of the man of lawlessness.

We should be very cautious about making one disputed word carry an entire end-times timeline.

If Paul meant:

“The Church must be raptured first,”

we might reasonably expect him to say so more clearly.

5. What Does the Man of Lawlessness Do?

Paul describes him:

“He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped.”

Then:

“he sets himself up in God's temple, proclaiming himself to be God.”

— 2 Thessalonians 2:4

This is strong language.

This figure opposes God.

He exalts himself.

He claims divine prerogatives.

And he takes his seat in:

THE TEMPLE OF GOD.

That phrase has produced enormous debate.

What temple does Paul mean?

6. Does Paul Say the Temple Will Be Rebuilt?

No.

That is important.

Paul does not say:

“A Temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem.”

He simply says:

“the temple of God.”

When Paul wrote 2 Thessalonians, the Jerusalem Temple was still standing.

So it is certainly possible that his readers could have understood the phrase in relation to that Temple.

But there is another possibility we must consider.

Because Paul uses the expression “temple of God” elsewhere.

And when he does, he often isn't talking about a building in Jerusalem.

7. What Does Paul Usually Call God's Temple?

Paul tells the Corinthian Christians:

“Don't you know that you yourselves are God's temple and that God's Spirit dwells in your midst?”

— 1 Corinthians 3:16

Then:

“God's temple is sacred, and you together are that temple.”

— 1 Corinthians 3:17

Later:

“For we are the temple of the living God.”

— 2 Corinthians 6:16

And Paul tells the Ephesians that Jews and Gentiles together are being built:

“into a holy temple in the Lord.”

— Ephesians 2:21

For Paul, God's people have become God's temple.

So when Paul says the man of lawlessness sits in “the temple of God,” we should at least ask:

DOES PAUL MEAN A JEWISH BUILDING—or THE PEOPLE OF GOD?

The passage itself does not explicitly answer that question.

We should not pretend that it does.

8. Don't Prove Too Much

It would be easy for us to go too far in the other direction.

We could say:

“Paul calls the Church God's temple elsewhere. Therefore 2 Thessalonians 2 must mean the Church.”

That would be too quick.

The Jerusalem Temple still existed when Paul wrote.

And Paul could certainly refer to a physical sanctuary when the context required it.

So there are real possibilities here.

But one thing is clear:

PAUL NEVER SAYS “A REBUILT TEMPLE.”

That detail has been supplied by an interpretation.

It is not stated in the passage.

9. His Readers Already Knew Something We Don't

Then Paul says something extremely important:

“Don't you remember that when I was with you I used to tell you these things?”

— 2 Thessalonians 2:5

That verse should make every interpreter humble.

Paul had already explained this subject orally to the Thessalonians.

They knew things we do not know.

We have the letter.

They had the letter plus Paul's previous teaching.

That may explain why Paul can refer to:

“what is holding him back”

without identifying it.

The Thessalonians apparently knew what he meant.

We don't.

So this is not a passage in which dogmatism comes easily.

10. What Is the Restrainer?

Paul says:

“And now you know what is holding him back, so that he may be revealed at the proper time.”

— 2 Thessalonians 2:6

Then:

“the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he is taken out of the way.”

— verse 7

Who—or what—is this restrainer?

Paul doesn't tell us.

Suggestions through the centuries have included:

The Roman Empire.

Civil government.

An angelic power.

The preaching of the gospel.

The Holy Spirit.

The Church.

Divine providence.

And other possibilities.

But Paul does not identify the restrainer in the letter.

So what should we say?

WE DON'T KNOW FOR CERTAIN.

The Thessalonians apparently did.

We don't.

That may not be satisfying.

But sometimes “the text doesn't tell us” is the most biblical answer available.

11. Does the Restrainer Have to Be the Holy Spirit?

A popular interpretation says the restrainer is the Holy Spirit working through the Church.

When the Church is raptured, the restrainer is “taken out of the way.”

Then the Antichrist can be revealed.

But notice how many steps are required.

Paul never says:

The restrainer is the Holy Spirit.

The Holy Spirit is removed from the earth.

The Church is the restrainer.

The Church is removed before the man of lawlessness appears.

Those conclusions may be part of a larger theological system.

But:

PAUL DOES NOT STATE THEM HERE.

That distinction matters.

12. Now Notice Something Easy to Miss

Paul says:

“For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work.”

— 2 Thessalonians 2:7

ALREADY.

Whatever final manifestation Paul expected, the power behind it was not entirely future.

Lawlessness was already operating in Paul's own day.

That should affect how we read the prophecy.

Paul does expect a future revelation.

But he also sees continuity between something already active and what will eventually be revealed.

This is not simply a story that begins thousands of years after Paul.

Its roots were already present.

13. John Says Something Similar

John writes:

“Even now many antichrists have come.”

— 1 John 2:18

And:

“This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world.”

— 1 John 4:3

Notice the similarity.

Something is coming.

Yet something is already at work.

Paul:

“the secret power of lawlessness is already at work.”

John:

“the spirit of the antichrist... is already in the world.”

That doesn't prove Paul and John are describing exactly the same figure.

But it gives us a biblical pattern worth noticing.

Opposition to Christ is not merely a future phenomenon.

It was already operating in the apostolic age.

14. Does Paul Call Him “The Antichrist”?

No.

This is another important distinction.

Paul calls him:

“the man of lawlessness.”

And:

“the lawless one.”

John is the New Testament writer who uses the word “antichrist.”

Interestingly, the word antichrist never appears in Revelation.

And Paul does not use it here.

Can Paul's man of lawlessness be related to what John calls antichrist?

Possibly.

But the Bible itself never explicitly says:

“THE MAN OF LAWLESSNESS IS THE ANTICHRIST.”

That identification is an interpretation.

Again, it may be correct.

But we should know when Scripture stops speaking and our synthesis begins.

15. What Happens When He Is Revealed?

Paul says:

“And then the lawless one will be revealed.”

— 2 Thessalonians 2:8

What happens to him?

Paul doesn't describe a long political career.

He moves immediately to his destruction:

“whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming.”

The lawless one may look powerful.

But compared with Christ?

He is nothing.

Jesus destroys him by:

THE SPLENDOR OF HIS COMING.

Paul's emphasis is not:

“Look how powerful the man of lawlessness is.”

It is:

LOOK HOW POWERFUL JESUS IS.

16. Which Coming Destroys Him?

This is important because Paul began the chapter:

“Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him...”

— verse 1

Then in verse 8 the lawless one is destroyed by:

“the splendor of his coming.”

Same chapter.

Same subject.

Christ comes.

His people are gathered to Him.

The lawless one is destroyed.

That sounds remarkably straightforward.

So where would a separate secret coming seven years earlier fit into Paul's explanation?

Paul doesn't mention one here.

17. Remember What Paul Said in His First Letter

In 1 Thessalonians 4 Paul described:

The Lord descending from heaven.

A loud command.

The voice of the archangel.

The trumpet of God.

The dead in Christ rising.

Living believers being caught up with them.

All meeting the Lord.

Then Paul moves directly into:

“the day of the Lord.”

— 1 Thessalonians 5:2

Now in 2 Thessalonians he again speaks of:

“the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him.”

Then he discusses events associated with:

“the day of the Lord.”

Paul appears to be discussing the same Christian hope.

Christ comes.

His people are gathered.

His enemies are defeated.

18. What About the Signs and Wonders?

Paul says:

“The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with how Satan works.”

He will use:

“all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie.”

— 2 Thessalonians 2:9

This is important.

The danger isn't merely political.

It is deception.

False power.

False signs.

False claims.

People are deceived because:

“they refused to love the truth and so be saved.”

— verse 10

Paul's concern is theological and spiritual.

The central issue is:

WILL PEOPLE LOVE THE TRUTH?

That sounds remarkably appropriate for a letter written to Christians being confused by false teaching.

19. Why Are People Deceived?

Paul continues with difficult words:

“For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie.”

— verse 11

Why?

Because:

“all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.”

— verse 12

Notice again Paul's concern.

Truth.

Falsehood.

Deception.

Lawlessness.

Faithfulness.

The passage is not primarily designed to satisfy our curiosity about the identity of a future political leader.

It is warning us about the spiritual danger of rejecting truth.

20. Then Paul Turns Back to the Christians

After all of this, Paul says:

“But we ought always to thank God for you, brothers and sisters loved by the Lord...”

— verse 13

Then he tells them:

“stand firm and hold fast to the teachings we passed on to you.”

— verse 15

There is the pastoral purpose.

They were frightened.

They were being deceived.

Paul did not want them drawing charts.

He wanted them to:

STAND FIRM.

HOLD FAST.

LOVE THE TRUTH.

That is the practical message of the chapter.

21. Now Make Two Lists

As we did with Revelation 20 and Matthew 24, let's separate what Paul says from what is commonly added to his words.

2 THESSALONIANS 2 DOES SAY:

Christ will come.

God's people will be gathered to Him.

The Day of the Lord had not already arrived.

A rebellion will occur.

The man of lawlessness will be revealed.

He opposes and exalts himself against God.

He takes his seat in the temple of God.

Something restrains him.

The Thessalonians apparently knew what the restrainer was.

The mystery of lawlessness was already at work.

The lawless one will be revealed.

Satanic deception accompanies him.

Jesus destroys him by the splendor of His coming.

Those who reject truth are condemned.

Christians must stand firm and hold to the truth.

Now look at the other list.

2 THESSALONIANS 2 DOES NOT SAY:

The man of lawlessness is called “the Antichrist.”

He will be a future world president or dictator.

He signs a seven-year treaty with Israel.

A seven-year tribulation follows.

A Jewish Temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem.

The man of lawlessness breaks a treaty after three and one-half years.

The Church is secretly raptured before he appears.

The restrainer is the Holy Spirit.

The restrainer is the Church.

The Holy Spirit leaves the earth.

Christ comes secretly and then returns visibly seven years later.

None of those statements appears in 2 Thessalonians 2.

Some may be argued by combining other passages with this one.

But that is exactly the point.

THEY COME FROM THE COMBINATION—not FROM THIS PASSAGE ITSELF.

22. Is It Wrong to Compare Different Prophecies?

Of course not.

Scripture should interpret Scripture.

Paul knew Daniel.

Jesus quoted Daniel.

John's Revelation draws heavily from Daniel.

Biblical writers share themes and images.

Comparing passages is essential.

But there is a difference between:

COMPARING TEXTS

and:

MERGING TEXTS BEFORE WE HAVE INTERPRETED THEM.

First ask what Daniel says in Daniel's context.

Ask what Jesus says in Matthew 24.

Ask what Paul says in 2 Thessalonians 2.

Ask what John says in Revelation.

Then compare them.

Otherwise, we may take one detail from Daniel...

another from Matthew...

another from Paul...

another from Revelation...

put them together...

and then read the finished picture back into every passage.

At that point it becomes difficult to tell which author actually said what.

23. Could the Man of Lawlessness Have Been a First-Century Figure?

That question deserves to be asked.

After all:

The Jerusalem Temple was still standing.

The mystery of lawlessness was already working.

The restrainer was apparently something the Thessalonians knew about.

Paul expected his original readers to understand his teaching.

Those facts have led some interpreters to look for a first-century fulfillment.

Various figures have been suggested.

But the passage does not name one.

And Paul connects the lawless one's destruction with:

“the splendor of [Christ's] coming.”

That has led many other interpreters to expect a final manifestation of lawlessness associated with the end.

Again, we should resist pretending Paul tells us more than he does.

Perhaps the best conclusion is:

LAWLESSNESS WAS ALREADY WORKING—and PAUL EXPECTED ITS ULTIMATE DEFEAT WHEN CHRIST COMES.

That much is clear.

24. Is the Man of Lawlessness One Individual?

Paul certainly speaks of him as an individual:

“the man of lawlessness.”

“he.”

“the lawless one.”

So an individual fulfillment is entirely natural.

But biblical prophecy can sometimes personify larger powers in an individual ruler or representative.

Daniel's beasts are kingdoms, yet individual kings embody those kingdoms.

Revelation's beast similarly represents more than one human personality.

So we should leave room for the possibility that Paul's “man of lawlessness” represents both a personal embodiment of rebellion and the larger lawless power behind him.

Again:

DON'T SAY MORE THAN PAUL SAYS.

25. What Is Actually Clear?

After all the difficult questions, quite a lot is clear.

Lawlessness opposes God.

It was already working in Paul's day.

Its power is satanic.

It deceives people who refuse to love the truth.

God limits its activity.

It will not win.

Christ will come.

God's people will be gathered to Him.

And the lawless one will be destroyed by:

THE SPLENDOR OF CHRIST'S COMING.

That is Paul's certainty.

Perhaps we should spend more time on what Paul makes certain and less time pretending certainty about what he leaves unexplained.

26. What Was Paul Trying to Accomplish?

Return to the beginning.

These Christians were:

“unsettled or alarmed.”

Someone had deceived them about the Day of the Lord.

Paul wanted to stabilize them.

So he ends the discussion by telling them:

“stand firm.”

That is the purpose.

Not:

“Identify the Antichrist before everyone else.”

Not:

“Calculate the seven years.”

Not:

“Determine the date.”

But:

DON'T BE DECEIVED.

LOVE THE TRUTH.

STAND FIRM.

Those instructions are just as important today as they were in Thessalonica.

27. Read Paul Before Building the Antichrist

Suppose you had never seen an end-times chart.

Suppose you had never heard that the Antichrist signs a seven-year treaty with Israel.

Suppose no one had told you that a Jewish Temple must be rebuilt.

Suppose you had never heard that the Holy Spirit is removed from the earth when the Church is raptured.

Then you opened 2 Thessalonians and read chapter 2.

Would you construct that story from Paul's words?

Or would you see something simpler?

Christ will come.

His people will be gathered to Him.

Lawlessness opposes God.

Its secret power is already working.

A climactic opponent will be revealed.

Deception will be powerful.

God remains in control.

Jesus destroys His enemy when He comes.

And Christians must:

STAND FIRM AND LOVE THE TRUTH.

Before identifying Paul's man of lawlessness with someone from another prophecy...

Before supplying a rebuilt Temple...

Before supplying seven years...

Before identifying the restrainer...

Before building the timeline...

READ PAUL.

Then compare him carefully with the rest of Scripture.

That is how we keep our theology from becoming larger than the text that is supposed to support it.

TEXT B4 TRADITION

Read First. Conclude Later.

Return to Did The Bible Actually Predict That?