Romans 2:17–29

When Knowing the Law Is Not Enough

Paul has already made one thing clear.

God does not judge people by appearances.

He does not judge Gentiles by one standard and Jews by another.

“For God shows no partiality.”
— Romans 2:11

Now Paul turns directly to the Jew who believed his possession of the Law gave him a special standing before God.

Paul does not deny Israel’s privileges.

But he asks a harder question:

What good is knowing God’s Law if you do not obey it?

“If You Call Yourself a Jew”

Paul begins:

“But if you call yourself a Jew and rely on the law and boast in God...”
— Romans 2:17

He then lists several things in which a Jew could rightly take confidence.

He knew God’s will.

He had been instructed from the Law.

He considered himself:

  • a guide to the blind,

  • a light to those in darkness,

  • an instructor of the foolish,

  • a teacher of children.

Israel had received something the Gentile nations had not received.

God had revealed His Law to them.

The problem was not that they possessed the Law.

The problem was believing that possessing the Law was enough.

“You Then Who Teach Others, Do You Not Teach Yourself?”

Paul now turns the argument back on the teacher.

“You then who teach others, do you not teach yourself?”
— Romans 2:21

That question reaches much farther than first-century Judaism.

It is easy to know what Scripture says.

It is easy to tell someone else what Scripture says.

It is even possible to defend the truth while failing to live by the truth we defend.

Paul gives several examples.

You preach against stealing. Do you steal?

You condemn adultery. Do you commit adultery?

You boast in the Law. Do you dishonor God by breaking the Law?

Paul’s point is not that every Jewish teacher committed every sin in his list.

His point is that knowledge does not excuse disobedience.

The person who teaches God's commands is also accountable to them.

God’s Name Was Being Dishonored

Paul then says something especially serious:

“For, as it is written, ‘The name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you.’”
— Romans 2:24

Israel was supposed to show the nations what it meant to belong to the true God.

But when people claimed to represent God while living contrary to His will, the result was the opposite.

Instead of honoring God, they caused His name to be dishonored.

That is still a sobering principle.

People often judge the message by the lives of those who claim to believe it.

This does not make human behavior the standard of truth.

But it does mean that those who claim to know God should take seriously the way their lives reflect upon Him.

What About Circumcision?

Paul now turns to one of the clearest identifying marks of Jewish covenant membership.

Circumcision went all the way back to Abraham.

It was a sign of the covenant God had made with him and his descendants.

So Paul says:

“For circumcision indeed is of value if you obey the law...”
— Romans 2:25

Notice what Paul does not say.

He does not say circumcision had never mattered.

He says circumcision did not protect a person who rejected the God whose covenant it represented.

The outward sign could not replace faithfulness to God.

Then Paul makes the argument even stronger.

If an uncircumcised Gentile actually does what God requires, while a circumcised Jew breaks the Law, which one is really honoring God?

Paul is dismantling the idea that an outward religious identity automatically makes someone right with God.

Who Is Really a Jew?

Paul ends the chapter with words that would have been startling:

“For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical.”
— Romans 2:28

Then:

“But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter.”
— Romans 2:29

Paul is not pretending physical Israel never existed.

Nor is he saying circumcision had never been commanded.

He is making a distinction between outward identity and inward faithfulness.

A physical mark in the flesh cannot substitute for a heart that belongs to God.

This idea was not new with Paul.

Moses had already told Israel:

“Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart.”
— Deuteronomy 10:16

And later:

“The LORD your God will circumcise your heart...”
— Deuteronomy 30:6

The prophets made the same point.

God had always wanted more than an outward badge of covenant membership.

He wanted the heart.

“Whose Praise Is Not From Man but From God”

Paul closes with a play on the idea of praise:

“His praise is not from man but from God.”
— Romans 2:29

That is where Paul has been taking us throughout this chapter.

Human beings look at outward things.

God sees what is actually there.

A person may have:

the right ancestry,

the right religious name,

the Scriptures,

the right teachers,

and the right outward signs.

But none of those things can substitute for a heart that responds to God.

Paul Is Still Building His Case

We need to be careful not to stop Paul in the middle of his argument.

Romans 2 is not the conclusion.

Paul is still building toward it.

In Romans 1, the Gentile world stands guilty.

In Romans 2, the religious person discovers that he cannot escape God's judgment simply because he possesses God's Law.

So what is left?

Can anyone stand before God on the basis of his own righteousness?

Paul will answer that very soon:

“For we have already charged that all, both Jews and Greeks, are under sin.”
— Romans 3:9

And then:

“For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”
— Romans 3:23

Paul is removing every reason for boasting before he explains the good news.

The Gentile cannot boast.

The Jew cannot boast.

The moral person cannot boast.

The religious teacher cannot boast.

Everybody needs what God has provided in Jesus Christ.

Before Moving On

Romans 2:17–29 leaves us with an uncomfortable but necessary question:

Am I trusting in knowing God’s Word, or am I allowing God’s Word to change me?

Knowing Scripture matters.

Teaching Scripture matters.

Being part of God's people matters.

But Paul will not allow any of those things to become a substitute for genuine faithfulness to God.

And that prepares us for his next question:

If the Jew cannot depend on possessing the Law or circumcision, was there any advantage in being a Jew at all?

That is exactly where Romans 3 begins.

Questions or comments?
Agree or disagree—we'd like to hear from you. Use the response form on our Home page.

Return to New Testament Books